Abstract

In the last twenty years economics has created much of lasting value and real potential: it has been a very fertile period. But economics has also suffered from «collective amnesia» covering whole areas of public policy. And on policy and the role of government it has, embarrassingly, swayed with the political winds to the detriment of both our profession and to outcomes. Both the amnesia and the political bending have contributed to the economic crisis of the last year or two and to hostility towards the profession. The purpose of the article is first to lament the amnesia on theories of public policy in imperfect economies, in short the subject of public economics, to describe the bending of public policy analysis to political vogue, and to indicate some of the consequences. Some of the mechanics of the processes are then described, in terms of choice of models and patterns of teaching. Finally, the example of climate change is used to illustrate some of the consequences of the amnesia, as well as of the political influence.