Abstract

The article aims to understand the definition that Gilles Deleuze gives of jurisprudence as a practice of subjectivation able to create a strong connection between law and life. Following Deleuze’s claims, we reconstruct three different genealogies, which concern the image of law, the critique of law and the juridical practice. In this way, the paper will show that jurisprudence is able to take into account singular cases and specific differences that no longer come under the umbrella of abstract laws.