A response to our reviewers
Are you already subscribed?
Login to check
whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.
Abstract
This essay responds to the critiques raised by Anke Hassel and Roberto Pedersini by focusing on four themes: the innovativeness (or not) of the growth models (GM) perspective, the need to integrate demand-side and supply-side considerations in the analysis of comparative capitalism, the relationship of the GM perspective to Post-Keynesian economics, and the role of agency and politics
