Omar Chessa

The Law of Bryceland. Essay on Rigid and Flexible Constitutions and on Parliamentary Sovereignty in the United Kingdom

Are you already subscribed?
Login to check whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.

Abstract

The essay concerns the traditional distinction between rigid and flexible constitutions and argues that every written constitution is naturally rigid (and not only in those cases in which a power of constitutional amendment is expressly provided or in those cases in which the constitution itself specifically permits amendments by the ordinary legislative power). The essay then examines the important principle which represents the basis of the United Kingdom's flexible constitution: the sovereignty of Parliament.

Keywords

  • Constitution
  • Rule of Recognition
  • Sovereignty
  • Parliament
  • Constitutional Amendment

Preview

Article first page

What do you think about the recent suggestion?

Trova nel catalogo di Worldcat