Martín Miguel Acebal

Reasons, Coercion and Passions in Manipulative Interaction

Are you already subscribed?
Login to check whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.

Abstract

This paper proposes a Peircean revision and reorganization of Classical rhetoric approaches to manipulation. The goal is to formulate a broad concept of manipulation, which allows us to combine these different contributions and to propose a systematization of different manipulative techniques. In the first instance, the work focuses on a review of classical rhetoric proposal. Secondly, it proposes a reorganization of the approaches through the semiotic nonagon (Guerri, 2003, 2016). Manipulation is presented as a broader notion, which brings together three dimensions: to move, to impose, and to convince. In a third, a visual organization is offered, as well as a description of the combinations of the nine sub-aspects of manipulation. These combinations follow the order proposed by Peirce to construct his ten classes of signs. These are used to recognize ten classes of manipulative figures: begging, temptation, threat, order, flattery, seduction, challenge, advice, warning, and argumentation

Keywords

  • Manipulative Figures
  • Manipulative Interaction
  • Peircean Semiotics
  • Rhetoric
  • Semiotic Nonagon

Preview

Article first page

What do you think about the recent suggestion?

Trova nel catalogo di Worldcat