Dialogue between the Courts and Judicial Borrowing: An Inferentialist Perspective
Are you already subscribed?
Login to check
whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.
Abstract
My aim in this paper is to analyze the so-called dialogue between national and international courts by employing the tools of inferentialist semantics as developed by Robert Brandom. After reviewing the essential features of judicial borrowing, I will introduce some aspects of Brandom's semantics and try to show in what way it can be brought to bear on the dialogue between courts. I will close the discussion by arguing that it is misleading to characterize such interactions as "dialogue".
Keywords
- Judicial Borrowing
- Dialogue between Courts
- Robert Brandom
- Inferentialism
- Social Networks Analysis
