The Influence of Ernst R. Bierling on the Vienna Law School
Are you already subscribed?
Login to check
whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.
Abstract
Far from a “psychologicalµ interpretation of the work of Bierling in this article I defend the thesis that Bierling is a predecessor of the Pure Theory of Law. This can be demonstrated through the main thoughts of Bierling: First, the central concept of the General Theory of Law is the concept of legal norm understood as an act of will (wollen) that expresses a duty (an “ought toµ: sollen). Second, legal norms have a hierarchical structure (Stufenbau) in the legal order. Third, the hierarchical structure of legal norms presupposes a basic norm (Grundnorm) as the last foundation of their validity (Geltung). Fourth, the concept of acknowledgment (Anerkennung) is a psycosocial concept that is analogue to the Kelsenian concept of efficacy (Wirksamkeit). Legal concepts, that is the concepts produced by Legal Science, are formal concepts (legal scientific formalism).
Keywords
- Bierling
- Kelsen
- Legal Norm
- Legal Order
- Hierarchical Structure
- Basic Norm (Grundnorm)
- Acknowledgment (Anerkennung)
- Efficacy
- Normativism
- Voluntarism
- Formalism