Abstract

The recent replicability crisis in Psychology has attracted remarkable attention in the field and it is starting to have an impact on current research practices. In this contribution, I present some concrete suggestions, presented in an informal style, on what should be done based on the lessons that have started to be learned from the replicability debate. The emphasis is on methodological issues and practices that altogether facilitate the likelihood of drawing correct inferences from data and, therefore, help researchers to separate the signal from the noise.