Abstract

The article focuses on the recent decision of the Supreme Court regarding the contrast between parents on children religious education. The decision highlights the role of the child in case of conflict concerning choices which directly affect him. The possibility for the judge to adopt restrictive measures of parents individual rights is closely connected and can depend on the assessment of concrete negative consequences for the child. According to the Court, this assessment must be based on the observation and hearing of the child. The author focuses on the criteria chosen by the jurisprudence to resolve cases of conflict on religious education to be given to the child.