Roberto Bin

Grey areas in judicial review and dark areas in legal reasoning

Are you already subscribed?
Login to check whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.


The essay focuses on a few recent decision of the Italian Constitutional Court, concerning the so-called «constitutional position» of the Italian Audit Office (or Court of Audits) with regards to the judicial review of regional legislation. By adopting the decision 196/2018 the Constitutional Court introduced a third and new way of reviewing regional legislation, in addiction to the «direct» and the «incidental» review: the Court of Audits, while performing «a posteriori» performance audit of regional budget, can challenge the validity of a regional law. It remains, however, unlikely that the Court of Audits will raise the issue of legitimacy of a State law, even though in a previous decision, dating back to 1976, the Constitutional Court had stated that this could be possible.


  • Italian Audit Office
  • «A Posteriori» Performance Audit
  • Public Spending
  • Access
  • Judicial Review of Legislation
  • Regional Legislation
  • Constitution


Article first page

What do you think about the recent suggestion?

Trova nel catalogo di Worldcat