Abstract

Starting from the reconstruction of the constitutional jurisprudence on prolonged residence as a selective and excluding criterion of access to regional social housing policies, the essay develops a comment on the sentence n. 44 of 2020, that has strengthened the orientation of the Court strongly critical towards the use of such criterion in this sector, as it is a source of unjustified discrimination and because it is extraneous to the ratio of these regulations and policies. The judgement of the Court, according to the author, can represent a conclusive point for the future choices of regional legislation.