Interpretation, Image, and Writing: On the Diagrammatic Essence of the Work of Art
Are you already subscribed?
Login to check
whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.
Abstract
The iconic nature of the dream makes it impossible, according to Freud, to express the syntactic connections: the task of interpretation is to reconstruct these connections. They can only be expressed through writing, what makes the dream, says Freud, a sort of rebus, combining words and images. This scriptural aspect of the dream, as a trace of the dream work, can also be found in the work of art, when its figurative character is overcome in favour of its symbolic dimension. This is shown through a discussion of Heidegger’s understanding of the truth of the work of art, referring first to a picture (van Gogh’s canvas) and then to a non-representational work, the Greek temple. The work of art has a scriptural, diagrammatic nature as a trace of the event that produced it. In the last part of the essay, Magritte’s painting, known for its inclusion of a writing «ceci n’est pas une pipe», is discussed, in order to show the complex relationship between image and writing
Keywords
- Image
- Negation
- Writing
- Work of Art
- Freud
- Heidegger