Emma A. Imparato

Comparative law and fundamental freedoms in Japan between civil Law and US common law. Some recent judgments of the Supreme Court

Are you already subscribed?
Login to check whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.

Abstract

Through an in-depth study of the historical background, the paper aims to analyze how foreign models have been influencing the Japanese legal system since the drafting of its constitutional charters to set fundamental freedoms and rights in the country. Since comparative method relies on the observation of elements, which operate in the legal system, the judgments adopted by the Supreme Court are taken into consideration, too. The scrutiny of the case-law shows how Japanese “living lawµ changes over time. This is true also with reference to the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court, particularly when the principle of equality is at stake. When it comes to the advancement of equality in society through the use of law, not without criticisms Japan not only represents an interesting operational laboratory (also for the role played by foreign law), but stands as an excellent example for countries in Southeast Asia, too.

Keywords

  • fundamental rights
  • equality
  • Japanese comparative law

Preview

Article first page

What do you think about the recent suggestion?

Trova nel catalogo di Worldcat