The legal regulation of trans-Mediterranean migrations from a comparative public law perspective. The cases of Tunisia and Morocco
Are you already subscribed?
Login to check
whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.
Abstract
This article examines the evolution of immigration law in Tunisia and Morocco, providing a significant viewpoint for comparative legal studies on the circulation of legal models and forms of State. Tunisia’s and Morocco’s immigration law, as a complex field influenced by diverse internal and external factors, will be studied in three aspects: the multiple forms of belonging and solidarity (based on markers of identity alternative to national citizenship); the pressures from the European Union on transit countries within border externalization policies; and the influence of political regime and form of State. Interdisciplinary research, incorporating political science and critical migration studies into comparative legal analysis, proves to be crucial for a comprehensive understanding of immigration law, especially in post-colonial Global South contexts.
Keywords
- Tunisia
- Morocco
- Immigration law
- EU border externalization
- circulation of legal models
- forms of State