Paolo Spinicci

The Constraints of the Ludic Imagination. Phaenomenological Reflections on Play

Are you already subscribed?
Login to check whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.

Abstract

Imagination is said to be a free faculty, the nature of which can be understood by stressing its independence from perceptual contexts and its subordination to the free choice of our will. The thesis of this essay is that this is not always and necessarily the case, and that a study of playful imagination compels us to observe how imagination has, on the one hand, a constraint on its content and, on the other, perceptual reasons that motivate it, regardless of our own decisions and free choices. Games of “pretenceµ often arise from reality and depend, in their possible execution, on the nature of the objects they use, a fact that allows us to grasp what playful imagination can teach us also in the field of artistic and expressive phenomena.

Keywords

  • Hume
  • Husserl
  • Involuntary Imagination
  • Poetic Imagery
  • Playful Imagination
  • Walton

Preview

Article first page

What do you think about the recent suggestion?

Trova nel catalogo di Worldcat