Domenico Perrotta

Disputed childbirth: The midwife between medical and humanizing discourse

Are you already subscribed?
Login to check whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.

Abstract

This article presents some findings of a study on the profession of midwife and the medicalisation of childbirth conducted in Italy by a team of sociologists and midwives; it was based on in-depth interviews with midwives and mothers and direct observation of childbirths in a National Health Service hospital. We will describe "biomedical discourse" and "humanizing discourse": these represent two different ways of defining and treating pregnancy, labour and childbirth. Biomedical discourse is hegemonic in Italy, while the knowledge of a midwife, central in the humanizing discourse, has a subordinate position. Through ethnographic descriptions of childbirths, we will show how medicalising decisions are taken by obstetricians, mothers-to-be and midwives. A physiological birth is often defined as pathological by the actors, not for "scientific" reasons, but for social and interactional ones, such as organisational and legal factors or working routines.

Keywords

  • Midwife
  • medicalization
  • childbirth
  • discourse
  • professions
  • sociology of health

Preview

Article first page

What do you think about the recent suggestion?

Trova nel catalogo di Worldcat