Aldo Schiavello

Joseph Raz for non-Anglophone. A Guide to Reading

Are you already subscribed?
Login to check whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.

Abstract

Joseph Raz is among the most celebrated and influential scholars in the Anglophone legal-philosophical debate. This author’s thought occupies a less central place in Italy and, more generally, in the non-Anglophone world. Beginning with a reconstruction of the causes that produced this difference, this essay proposes a wide-ranging – and, for this reason, necessarily partial and superficial – reconstruction of Raz’s thought and its main problematic cores. In particular, the following will be critically discussed: 1) the Razian notion of “reason for actionµ; 2) the distinction between reasons of different levels; 3) the notion of authority and its relevance to law; and, finally, 4) the way Raz reconstructs the relations between law and morality. In general, one can view Raz’s thought as an attempt to defend through moral arguments an a-moral law, that is, a law whose individuation prescinds (must prescind) from moral criteria. Raz’s is perhaps the best possible version of legal positivism in a historical period when this legal-philosophical perspective no longer expresses the esprit du temps.

Keywords

  • Legal normativity
  • Reasons for action
  • Legal positivism
  • Legitimate authority
  • Law and morality

Preview

Article first page

What do you think about the recent suggestion?

Trova nel catalogo di Worldcat