André Gaudreault

CINEMA, AN ART MORE PHOTOGRAPHIC THAN AUTOGRAPHIC

Are you already subscribed?
Login to check whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.

Keywords

  • It would be difficult to situate cinema
  • in the sense of institutional cinema
  • in a chart whose purpose would be to illustrate the various allographic and autographic aspects (in the sense Goodman and Genette use these terms) of different art forms. Cinema is a complex art in which
  • like in a rhizome
  • various expressive means
  • channels of transmission
  • systems of notation and modes of execution overlap. The task is even bigger with respect to the body of films known as early cinema
  • or rather kine-attractography. Early cinema is a hundred times more rhizome-like than institutional cinema
  • because it involves a number of â€
  • œ
  • performativeâ€
  • 
  • gestures (live music or commentary
  • etc.) whose effect is to multiply the sites of creation or authorship. Kine-attractography involves both allographic recording (because it is purely instrumental) and the autographic performance of a given actor
  • even though anonymous
  • in an execution-screening complemented by equally autographic performances by live figures. Hence
  • the difficulty in identifying the underlying system joining the various instances at work in such situations. Just as photography rhymes with allography
  • cinema is a photographic art before it is an autographic one

Preview

Article first page

What do you think about the recent suggestion?

Trova nel catalogo di Worldcat