CINEMA, AN ART MORE PHOTOGRAPHIC THAN AUTOGRAPHIC
Are you already subscribed?
Login to check
whether this content is already included on your personal or institutional subscription.
Keywords
- It would be difficult to situate cinema
- in the sense of institutional cinema
- in a chart whose purpose would be to illustrate the various allographic and autographic aspects (in the sense Goodman and Genette use these terms) of different art forms. Cinema is a complex art in which
- like in a rhizome
- various expressive means
- channels of transmission
- systems of notation and modes of execution overlap. The task is even bigger with respect to the body of films known as early cinema
- or rather kine-attractography. Early cinema is a hundred times more rhizome-like than institutional cinema
- because it involves a number of â
-
- performativeâ
-
- gestures (live music or commentary
- etc.) whose effect is to multiply the sites of creation or authorship. Kine-attractography involves both allographic recording (because it is purely instrumental) and the autographic performance of a given actor
- even though anonymous
- in an execution-screening complemented by equally autographic performances by live figures. Hence
- the difficulty in identifying the underlying system joining the various instances at work in such situations. Just as photography rhymes with allography
- cinema is a photographic art before it is an autographic one