Skip to main content

Table of contents of the issue 1/2019, January-June
La crisi della fattispecie

ISBN: 978-88-43-09542-1

Year: 24

Giuseppe Zaccaria

Introduzione. Crisi della fattispecie, crucialità del caso, concetto di legalità

Ars interpretandi 1/2019 pp: 7-14 DOI: 10.7382/93836

Francesco Belvisi

Legal Uncertainty and the Construction of Facts

Ars interpretandi 1/2019 pp: 15-30 DOI: 10.7382/93837

Tommaso Gazzolo

Borderline Cases and the Functions of Legal Concepts

Ars interpretandi 1/2019 pp: 31-48 DOI: 10.7382/93838

Giovanni D'Amico

The Irreplaceable Softness of the Legal Provision

Ars interpretandi 1/2019 pp: 49-70 DOI: 10.7382/93839

Guido Corso

Between Law and Legal Provision: The Perspective of Administrative Law

Ars interpretandi 1/2019 pp: 71-90 DOI: 10.7382/93840

Donato Castronuovo

Crisis of the Legal Provision and «Nullum Crimen»

Ars interpretandi 1/2019 pp: 91-110 DOI: 10.7382/93841

Piero Gaeta

The Illusion of the self-referring "Monad": Primacy of the Case and Crisis of Legal Provision in Criminal Law

Ars interpretandi 1/2019 pp: 111-134 DOI: 10.7382/93842

Luigi Rovelli

Legal Certainty: From Law to Consolidated interpretation and potential heterogenesis of the aims

Ars interpretandi 1/2019 pp: 135-146 DOI: 10.7382/93843

Natalino Irti

The Logical Necessity of Legal Provision (on a Leibnitian Definition)

Ars interpretandi 1/2019 pp: 147-152 DOI: 10.7382/93844

Dante Valitutti

Pittfalls in International Criminal Law. A theoretical Inquiry Moving from the Statute of the International Criminal Court

Ars interpretandi 1/2019 pp: 153-170 DOI: 10.7382/93845

Susanna Crispino

Interpretazione conforme al diritto europeo e internazionale in materia penale

Ars interpretandi 1/2019 pp: 171-196 DOI: 10.7382/93846

Recensione

Stefano Pietropaoli

P. Grossi, L'invenzione del diritto, Laterza, Roma-Bari 2017

Ars interpretandi 1/2019 pp: 197-200 DOI: 10.7382/93847

Stay updated, subscribe to our newsletter Subscribe >

Publisher's Ethics

The journals on this platform adopt and promote specific guidelines (PEMS) about publishing ethics. Our ethics statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.