Abstract

In this article, I intend to analyze the theoretical complexity of indignation in Hobbes’ thought. Indignation is a relatively marginal topic but is linked to the crucial concepts of natural law, right of resistance, sovereignty and to the articulation between ethics and politics. To this end, I focus initially on the definition this passion receives in the Briefe and the Elements, and then in Leviathan. Here, I highlight the variations in meaning and their conceptual implications. Subsequently, I explain why Hobbes cannot grant any legitimacy or efficacy to indignation. Still, on the other hand, he recognizes both from a factual point of view, attributing a constituent role to this affect